Microsoft gets mixed ruling in latest Alcatel-Lucent case
Microsoft received a mixed ruling in the latest round of lawsuits between it and Alcatel-Lucent.
This time, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California found that Microsoft did not infringe on an Alcatel-Lucent patent covering video encoding technology. "We are gratified that the jury found Microsoft did not infringe Alcatel-Lucent's video encoding patent and rejected Alcatel-Lucent's exorbitant US$419 million damages claim," said Tom Burt, Microsoft corporate vice president and deputy general counsel, in an e-mailed statement.
The jury also upheld four Microsoft patents, but found that Alcatel-Lucent didn't infringe them, and found one Microsoft patent invalid. Microsoft had been seeking damages of $9.5 million on five patent claims.
Alcatel-Lucent judged that ruling as a victory. "We believed from the beginning that Microsoft patent infringement allegations against Alcatel-Lucent were without merit and we presented a strong defensive argument. We are pleased that the jury agreed with us on this, and we appreciate the jury's time and the careful and thoughtful analysis they gave to this case," the company said in a statement.
Alcatel-Lucent declined to comment on the ruling regarding the video encoding patent, referring questions to the Multimedia Patent Trust, which now owns the relevant patent.
The video encoding case dates back to 2003 when Lucent charged Microsoft, Dell and Gateway with patent infringement concerning technologies in Windows and other video playback products, such as Windows Media Player.
In April, a jury in the same San Diego court found that Microsoft had infringed on two Alcatel-Lucent patents involving user interface technology and ordered Microsoft to pay $367 million. Microsoft is hoping to have the verdict overturned.
Last year, a court reversed a $1.5 billion patent-infringement ruling against Microsoft in another Alcatel-Lucent case.
The companies are also battling it out elsewhere. In May, the U.S. International Trade Commission found that Alcatel-Lucent had not infringed on Microsoft patents related to unified communications.
IDG News Service
Symantec Backup Exec 12 and Backup Exec System Recovery 8 deliver industry leading Windows data protection and system recovery. Download this whitepaper to find out the top reasons to upgrade and how to get continuous data protection and complete system recovery.
Data and system loss — from a hard drive failure, malicious attack, natural disaster, or simple human error — can happen anytime. Don’t leave your business vulnerable. Make sure you have a secure recovery strategy in place. Symantec's latest backup and system recovery technology can efficiently restore critical applications, individual emails and documents and even restore your entire system in minutes in the event of a loss.
Businesses face a growing challenge to ensure that the IT environment is properly protected. Backup Exec 12 integrates with other applications in the Symantec family of products, to complement your current data protection strategy, keep your data securely backed up and make it recoverable when you need it most.
Crimeware: Understanding New Attacks and Defenses
By Markus Jakobsson, Zulfikar Ramzan
Published Apr 6, 2008 by Addison-Wesley Professional. Part of the Symantec Press series.
Enter now! | Official rules | Sample chapter
Securing VoIP Networks: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Countermeasures
By Peter Thermos, Ari Takanen
Published Aug 1, 2007 by Addison-Wesley Professional.
Enter now! | Official rules | Sample chapter
